Communion In The Hand And Other Similar Frauds - Michael Davies

Welcome to the web edition. Below is text extracted from the PDF for reading on any device. Use Download for the original file to print or share offline.

translating the passage from Bucer’s

Women who murder their unborn babies are exercising their “right to choose”. Literature that classified as “adult”. Perverts who were once looke

minority groups with an “alternate” [but legitimate] lifestyle. Even Catholic bishops treat them

Pope John’s Council

bishops who entered St. Peter’s Basilica on Oct.

of the clichés fabricated by the Liberal “experts’, in the media they controlled as ‘new insights’ in tune with the

creatures of their own “experts”, it can be found in the imposition of Communion in the hand “experts”.

the episcopal college which took place at the same time are recorded by St. Matthew: “ saith to Him: ‘Yea, though I should die with Thee I will not deny Thee. And in like manner said [Matt. XXVI, 35]”. But in verse 56 we read: “

.” However, one Apostle did take his— Peter. The principle that “” appli

[Britain’s largest Catholic weekly] informed its

ry Catholic would not read this and ask himself: “” He would accept that it

Yesterday’s orthodoxy has become today’s heresy. Catholics

dutifully to tedious ‘unity’ services because he tells them that they must. He tells them this

—

epitomization of the “Spirit of Vatican II”, the spirit which pervades the “Conciliar Church” to

aith, so clearly expressed and professed by the Church’s Magisterium for

Church. Reduced to its simplest terms, their argument reads: “ ” This argument is totally fallacious and has been most forcefully condemned by Pope

answer to contemporary liturgical and doctrinal innovators is to be found in Newman’s

itable that there should be development in every aspect of the Church’s life. The

correctly observed that “

.”

Cranmer’s Godly Order

adequate today, as we are now in the presence of ‘modern man’, of humanity ‘come of age’, of the ‘adult Catholic’. In his book called “modern man” is a myth, invented by the sociologists, that in his

—

Fr. Jungmann cites “” as the decisive reason.

— —

—

American Bishops’ Committee on the Liturgy, writes of this as if it were something to be

faithful needing to see “” would have been totally alien to the

the close of the ninth century, but which is found totally deplorable by today’s proponents of

—

shops’ Committee on the

J. O’Brien,

of the Mass and in the full substantial reality of Christ’s —

“”. Then

ion. Say “”, and sanctify yourself by partaking of Christ’s

The dispensing of Christ’s Body belongs to the priest for three reasons. First, because, as

as the consecration of Christ’s Body belongs to the priest, so likewise does the dispensing

the people, hence as it belongs to him to offer the people’s gifts to God, so it belongs

and the chalice are consecrated, and likewise the priest’s hands, for touching this

—

years does not possess this particular significance is to rob the word ‘symbol’ of any meaning. It

the mystery of the Lord’s death, see that your bodies are wholly dead to every vice and

he hands symbolizes the priest’s public ministry of service to

“public ministry of service to others”—

on’s hands were never anointed.

It can be pointed out that in some regions at least, the deacon’s hands WERE consecrated—

The care of the chalice has remained the deacon’s special province down to modern

—

‘Presidential’ chairs —

—

—

Hildebrand, who writes: “evils in C. S. Lewis’ .”

—

, he warned us of “

.” This

pt to revive the ‘archaeologism’ to

her capacity of watchful guardian of ‘the deposit of faith’ entrusted to her by her Divine

—

— —

It will be noted here that the consecration of the priest’s hands is seen as indicating the privilege

—

This is an original translation but Bucer’s

“” a two petition the Holy See for permission to legalize the abuse. Quite clearly, the phrase “ ” meant by that date, May 28, 1969. Coun —

—

published by the American Bishops’ Committee on the Liturgy. There is a popular saying

M. Champlin [presumably a cleric, although he doesn’t bother to say so]. It is published by the

n. Within a few years’

—

“survey” bishops throughout the world, but Joseph M. Champlin deems it unnecessary for

legalize the abuse [they could hardly “” as it c —

“” during “ ”.

Pope John’s

“time bombs” introduced by the ‘experts’ who drew up the documents for which th

hamplin’s linking of the abuse with the

You Can’t Beat Them, Join Them

to ask “?” — ?” —”?” —”?” —”?”

—

goodness of God’s creation and in the holiness achieved through Christ’s entrance into

—

— —

does? And why doesn’t receiving Communion on the tong

onsecrated by these rites, sharers in Jesus’ priesthood, and a new creation.

saying ‘Amen’], greater participation by the

Forms a positive, human, understandable response to Jesus’ invitation ‘take and eat’..

—the vocabulary of the “Conciliar Church” with a

fruitful reception of the Lord’s Body. [Author’s emphasis]

—

—

“Conciliar Church” in Germany. During the war her family, like so many of the European

[“.”] The National ] issued by Dr. Goebbels’ propaganda ministry, calumniated “” of the Catholic Church [s

much to commend in the “Conciliar Church”!

—

—

...

—

can join those Catholics who have “come of age”, who are “mature” and “adult”, who stand

The truth of the matter may well be that a “Conciliar Catholic” has no God but himself.

it is no longer fitting for ‘democratic’ modern man? Does religious re suffering from an unfortunate case of ‘sociologitis’, which nonsensically wants to deduce

— —

There is ample testimony to the fact that the liturgical “renewal” has been accompanied not

—

—

Eucharist? The practice of receiving ‘Holy Communion in the hand’ must not become an

— ead of doing so, he allowed his “experts” to send out the standard

But Cardinal Heenan’s co result in his refusing to commission lay ministers of Holy Communion; Bishop Ackerman’s

said, ‘the Presence does not remain when the meal is finished’; sometimes these Hosts

Consecration; because, they hold, ‘Christ is present only in the meal’. Some have use ‘one does not adore a box’.

—

Lord’s Supper has been gaining strength within the Church. The sacrificial nature of the Mass is

——

—Ed’s note

—

Pope John’s CouncilPope Paul’s

padding and look for what each document permits that wasn’t permitted before. Sadly, when

Blessed Sacrament is exposed. He comments that this instruction is disturbing, “ ”. Its origin is an official decree of the Congregation for Worship approved by Pope

—

—

—

—

— perhaps this is what the American bishops mean by “ ”. It opens the way to irreverence, profanation of the Blessed Sacrament, and division

“Observers from countries that have already introduced the option offer encouraging testimony about the positive acceptance and relatively smooth implementation of communion in the hand.”

an be noted here that, at the 1977 Bishops’ Synod in Rome, high praise was given in the

again, it is typical of the “Conciliar Church” that no criteria were provided for deciding what was meant by “established”. Did it mean just one priest giving Communion

——

Bishop Blanchette’s motion was supported in writing by five other bishops and sustained by the

arrived at. Those who criticize the innovation are attacked for making a fuss about a ‘trivial’

, the mouthpiece of some of Britain’s

like ‘not for release before co.01 hours on suchsuch a date’]. The same sort of

‘opposition’ before they had a chance to really get going. A pity, then, that this

—

Britain and the U.S.A. certainly illustrates a point made at the beginning of this study: “

of the ‘spirit of Vatican II’, the spirit which pervades the ‘Conciliar Church’, to which .’

not in tune with the “Spirit of Vatican II”, anti

If the multitude of men are ever in the broad way ‘that leadeth to destruction’, there is no

—

Conciliar Church (“ veritable a l’Eglise conciliare”). The full text of this letter appeared in

—

—

[“ .”]

prescribes: ‘Holy Communion should be distributed by the competent

consecrated Bread’.

—

the discipline governing the faithful’s mode of receiving the holy Sacrament.

the complete fulfillment of Christ’s mandate have been

the great reverence and prudence shown to the holy Eucharist. For “ ,”

and each recipient is warned: “... ”

: “.”

special way to sacred ministers or to persons assigned to this function: “

.”

the preparation needed for the most fruitful reception of the Lord’s body.

This reverence is a sign of communion not in “”

Blood of the Lord. By it “

.”

species, in which “ ,”

maintained: “ .”

rvations and the counsel of those whom “ ”

iscopal conference fulfill their pastoral office in today’s often